First lies, and now even worse: Iraq will have to suffer more help

In my attempt to bring some opinions and information about Iraq and the responsibility of Bush government 's role in the mess created there, I am publishing a new article.First lies and now, even worse: more helpSimon JenkinsAfter years of deceit, we are expected to believe things are getting better. What Iraq really needs is to be left alone.WE ARE bid to celebrate the fourth birthday of a lie. In 2003, they lied about Iraq's weapons arsenal. They lied about Saddam Hussein's "imminent threat"to Britain. Some of them lied that he was involved in 9/11. Today, steeped in the psychology of denial, they lie that things are really fine, are gettingbetter, are better than before, are on the turn. There might have been mistakes, but there was no great mistake.What of those who pretended not to lie, who slunk to the back of the room, said it was not their department, "trusted Tony," did what they were told, kepttheir heads down? This was the Downing Street set that covered their lies by boasting they were so clever they could "write their own narrative."Britons should not celebrate the fourth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq. Celebration is for those lucky Iraqis entitled to feel genuinely better forfour years of freedom from Saddam Hussein, the salutary boon to the otherwise calamitous affliction visited on their country. The important anniversaryis not that of the past but of the future. Can March 2008 see five years of western intervention finally reversed?Some order restoredThe "surge" programme initiated last month by General Petraeus in Baghdad is the first intelligent thing the Americans have done in four years. By swampingneighbourhoods, monitoring entry, patrolling streets and giving personal protection to residents and tradesmen, troops are able to restore some order toportions of the city. General Petraeus is replacing vigilantes, militias, and corrupt police with his own soldiers. He cannot reverse the ethnic cleansingthat is fast partitioning Baghdad into Sunni and Shia quarters, but he can stabilise what has occurred.The Americans cannot possibly find tens of thousands of troops needed to police every block in Baghdad for months, let alone years. That General Petraeushad to bring Kurdish peshmergas down from the north to support his surge speaks volumes of the uselessness of the Iraqi army and police. Embedded journalistsvisiting bases in Sadr City and elsewhere report that militias are simply waiting for the Americans to leave. It makes a change for Americans to be protectingIraqis, after two years of pretending to train the Iraqi army. But the most the surge can do is give some Iraqi neighbourhoods breathing space and Washingtona few nice pictures. The Iraq police, that fine flower of Pentagon nation-building, is beyond parody as a plausible force of law and order.Turning the armed gangs into some sort of disciplined corps over the next year holds the key to civil security in Iraq. For the two million Iraqis in internaland external exile to return to active economic life requires them to feel safe in their homes and streets. Foreigners cannot guarantee that, nor can anynational army or police. They are not trusted. The coming year must see parleys between local commanders, sheikhs, and religious leaders, neighbourhoodalliances, deals, and treaties. Such crude life-and-death negotiations will be the only shreds of civil autonomy left to the Iraqis after four years ofoccupation, all that is left to them with which to rebuild their civic institutions.The greatest fallacy of the coming year is that America or Britain might have any role to play in making March 2008 happier than 2007. While American search-and-destroypatrols roam Anbar province, Al-Qaeda cells will continue to recruit insurgents from abroad and foment sectarian hatred. While American tanks crash downstreets and shoot up villages, they brutalise all they touch. The arrogance that only by staying can we ensure that "things get better" or that "civilwar is averted" is now beyond obscenity.Whether or not Iraq is now progressively "partitioned" is largely a matter of terms. It has not been a unitary state for 10 years and is certainly not sotoday. It is a nation of a thousand neighbourhoods, each with degrees of anarchic sovereignty.Economies recover the more quickly the sooner they are left in peace. The hoodlums and gangsters now rich on American aid will harness the oil exports andeventually find a vested interest in protecting infrastructure and utilities. Religious segregation will enable the ghettos to feel more secure. Businesswill emerge from the bottom up, and doctors, teachers, and merchants will start to move back from Amman and Damascus, once they hear that their old homesare safe and the Mahdists and Badrists are confined to the barracks. Economic activity will return to the streets, as it has done to Beirut.The one thing that would speed this day is for everyone just to leave Iraq alone.Last week, the opposite happened. A nightmare convocation of 13 nations, including Americans, Britons, Russians, French, Syrians, Iranians, Chinese, Saudis,Jordanians, and Egyptians, piled into Baghdad to congratulate each other on their courage in descending amid the carnage and declare their eagerness tohelp Iraq.They talked trade, security, borders, aid, oil, refugees, and working groups galore. They patted each other on the back and went home. Poor Iraqis, I thought.First the lies and now, even worse, they must suffer more help.— © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2007